<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:1509a93b-8f75-5bb3-a174-ffb9a7a19f32</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD04-04: What AI set-ups do employers actually give trainees and junior staff?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld04-04/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld04-04/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:aac706ab-662a-523a-99e4-ee84481c95cb</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD04-04 — What AI set-ups do employers actually give trainees and junior staff?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld04-04/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-14T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">In law firms, hospitals and residency programmes, and software firms, what generative-AI tools, settings and rules do trainees and junior staff actually get, do they differ from what seniors get, and do any employers use the learning protections (hints instead of answers, AI-off practice) that experiments show protect skill?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
