<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:56c051f4-9ef7-5b86-bb2f-076b23b54eab</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD06-03: How much does knowing it is tested change a model&apos;s measured safety?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-03/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-03/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:3d4de4fc-0194-5eeb-b382-e01770eb1416</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD06-03 — How much does knowing it is tested change a model&apos;s measured safety?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-03/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">When the same safety scenarios are presented with and without minimal cues that they are tests, how large is the gap in measured behaviour across open and closed frontier models, and does suppressing evaluation awareness in open-weight models on the same items reproduce the gap?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
