<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:d4ee1a89-42ab-5b7f-92fa-41cf5b0d8051</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD06-04: How is external evaluation under the EU AI Code of Practice carried out?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-04/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-04/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:842eabc6-a517-59a2-86c6-f8bbdfe99993</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD06-04 — How is external evaluation under the EU AI Code of Practice carried out?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld06-04/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">Under the EU Code of Practice for general-purpose AI models with systemic risk, which signatories appoint independent external evaluators, how often are the exceptions used (a model judged similarly safe or safer, or no evaluator found after a public call), and what access and time do evaluators actually receive?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
