<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:896ff5d3-a459-5eeb-ae17-46f638334a88</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD08-03: Do developers&apos; usage statistics hold up when someone else classifies the conversations?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld08-03/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld08-03/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:9a7e0e4c-6c13-5e4e-be78-fec6606df838</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD08-03 — Do developers&apos; usage statistics hold up when someone else classifies the conversations?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld08-03/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-16T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">When the same chatbot conversations are classified independently of the developer, with a validated scheme and human-coded benchmarks, how far do headline usage measures such as the automation share, the work share and task success move away from the figures developers publish?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
