<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <id>urn:uuid:6b089d42-d916-504c-8d01-3b824448a63e</id>
  <title>SocioLens — RO-LD09-06: In science, is it the wording that converges or the ideas?</title>
  <subtitle>New versions of this research opportunity and changes to the claims it rests on.</subtitle>
  <link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld09-06/feed.xml"/>
  <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld09-06/"/>
  <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>SocioLens</name></author>
  <entry>
    <id>urn:uuid:e9e68f77-2310-543f-a77f-0820c5e78602</id>
    <title type="text">New research opportunity: RO-LD09-06 — In science, is it the wording that converges or the ideas?</title>
    <link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/opportunities/ro-ld09-06/v1/"/>
    <updated>2026-10-15T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <summary type="text">In scientific papers and proposals written with language models, how much of the measured rise in similarity is shared wording and style, and how much is shared research questions, methods and claims, when the two are measured separately and validated against expert judgement?</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>
