The European Commission’s guidelines note that the AI Act’s definition of a “general-purpose AI model” “does not set out specific criteria” and adopt an indicative criterion: training compute above 10²³ FLOP and the ability to generate language, images or video, while calling compute “an imperfect proxy for generality and capabilities.”

SocioLens project,

Claim LD01-SL-C36 (v1.0)

Provenance and status

Claim type: Fact
Publication status: Eligible for publication, with qualifiers: legal scope
Verification state: Checked against the primary source. Who checked this claim is not recorded for it; claim checks so far were AI-led, and no person has checked claims against their sources.
Does not license: A claim that models below the threshold are not general-purpose, or that the guidelines bind courts
Limitations: The definition in Article 3(63) was read as quoted in the guidelines, not in the Official Journal; guidelines are not binding law; the Commission says the criterion may change as technology and the market evolve
Source (as cited): European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025
Source type: Government document (recorded as “Government publication”)
Institutional position: Regulator (European Commission)
Maturity of the evidence: Emerging evidence
Recorded date: 16 October 2026
Currentness / correction: This is the current version. No correction or concern is recorded on its sources.

Sources this version cites

European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025 (Government document)
No checked link to the original yet.

Version

This page shows version v1.0. Its record never changes, even when newer evidence arrives; the site may add a note to the page or withhold a figure not cleared for public use.

This pinned version is also the current version.

Versions: v1.0 · current

Raw record: every recorded field, with its coded values

All 25 canonical Claim fields, verbatim, with the coded values derived from them. The plain-language labels above are read from these.

Claim type (coded): FACT (as printed: “FACT”)
Publication status (coded): ELIGIBLE (LEGAL_SCOPE) (as printed: “ELIGIBLE WITH LEGAL-SCOPE QUALIFIER”)
Verification state (coded): CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY
Source type (coded): GOVERNMENT_PRIMARY
Maturity (coded): EMERGING

#	Canonical field	Canonical value (verbatim)	Normalized (Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2)
1	CLAIM ID	LD01-SL-C36	—
2	PUBLIC-FACING CLAIM	The European Commission’s guidelines note that the AI Act’s definition of a “general-purpose AI model” “does not set out specific criteria” and adopt an indicative criterion: training compute above 10²³ FLOP and the ability to generate language, images or video, while calling compute “an imperfect proxy for generality and capabilities.”	—
3	CLAIM TYPE	FACT	base_types: FACT
4	RESEARCH STRAND	C — Infrastructure, capital and legal category	—
5	MATURITY	EMERGING	states: EMERGING
6	SOURCE	European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025	source_ids: SRC-SL-EC-GPAI-GUIDELINES-C-2025-7719
7	SOURCE TYPE	Government publication	classes: GOVERNMENT_PRIMARY
8	INSTITUTIONAL POSITION	Regulator (European Commission)	—
9	SCOPE	European Union; providers of general-purpose AI models under the AI Act	—
10	DESIGN	Interpretive guidelines	—
11	SAMPLE / DATASET	Not applicable	—
12	MODEL / TOOL / VERSION	General-purpose AI models in general	—
13	COMPARATOR	AI systems built on those models	—
14	MAIN RESULT	Indicative criterion: a model trained with more than 10²³ FLOP that can generate language, images or video “likely is” a general-purpose AI model; systemic risk presumed above 10²⁵ FLOP; models distinguished from the downstream AI systems they are integrated into	—
15	INFERENTIAL TARGET	How EU law classifies generative AI models	—
16	DOES NOT LICENSE	A claim that models below the threshold are not general-purpose, or that the guidelines bind courts	—
17	VERIFICATION STATE	CONTENT VERIFIED	state: CONTENT_VERIFIED_PRIMARY · verified_by: UNKNOWN
18	LIMITATIONS	The definition in Article 3(63) was read as quoted in the guidelines, not in the Official Journal; guidelines are not binding law; the Commission says the criterion may change as technology and the market evolve	—
19	CONTRADICTORY / SUPPORTING SOURCES	LD01-SL-C11, LD01-SL-C28	—
20	GEOGRAPHY / LANGUAGE	EU / English	—
21	DISTRIBUTIONAL LEDGER	Not analysed in this claim	—
22	R01 / FIELD-MAP LINKS	LD-01, T4, D6	—
23	WHAT WOULD CHANGE THIS CLAIM?	Revised criteria, or a court ruling on the definition	—
24	PUBLICATION STATUS	ELIGIBLE WITH LEGAL-SCOPE QUALIFIER	state: ELIGIBLE · qualifiers: LEGAL_SCOPE
25	RECORDED DATE	2026-10-16	—

Field 22 references resolved against Field Map v0.2: LD-01 (LIVING_DEBATE); T4 (TENSION); D6 (DOMAIN)

The sources as recorded, with their record IDs and coded source types:

Pinned Sources (field 6, version-specific)

“European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025” → European Commission (2025), “Guidelines on the scope of…” (SRC-SL-EC-GPAI-GUIDELINES-C-2025-7719--v1.0) — European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025; class GOVERNMENT_PRIMARY (explicit public provenance pin)

Cited by Living Debate versions

What kind of thing is generative AI, and does the answer predict anything? (v0.1) LD-01

Cite this page

SocioLens project. (2026, October 16). The European Commission’s guidelines note that the AI Act’s definition of a “general-purpose AI model” “does not set out specific criteria” and adopt an indicative criterion: training compute above 10²³ FLOP and the ability to generate language, images or video, while calling compute “an imperfect proxy for generality and capabilities.” [Claim LD01-SL-C36, version v1.0]. SocioLens. https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld01-sl-c36/v1.0/

@misc{sociolens_ld01_sl_c36_v1_0,
  author = {{SocioLens project}},
  title = {The European Commission’s guidelines note that the AI Act’s definition of a “general-purpose AI model” “does not set out specific criteria” and adopt an indicative criterion: training compute above 10²³ FLOP and the ability to generate language, images or video, while calling compute “an imperfect proxy for generality and capabilities.”},
  year = {2026},
  date = {2026-10-16},
  howpublished = {\url{https://sociolens-web.pages.dev/claims/ld01-sl-c36/v1.0/}},
  note = {Claim LD01-SL-C36, version v1.0}
}

The link points to this version, whose record never changes. For a finding, cite the original study as well: SocioLens summarizes research and does not replace it.

Research-of-record provenance

Materialized by sociolens-materializer 0.6.0 at 2026-09-28T20:00:00.000Z; normalization contract SocioLens — Claim Value Vocabulary v1.0.2 — Pre-Spike Materialization Contract (v1.0.2). Content seal SHA-256 318a496f016c56a040d7eee8862b3ce8744784b061d9674dc79d88a29a2e6480.

Repository-authored inputs (not Drive exports)

SocioLens claim — LD01-SL-C36 v1.0 (v1.0) — written in the SocioLens repository by Project Lead (Claude, AI) on 2026-10-16; no Drive identity exists. Authority: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 16 October 2026 to build the LD-01 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-01 source notes, checked against full texts, official web pages or official abstracts. Block “ENTRY 36 — LD01-SL-C36” SHA-256 d568cc480e2c8eb43da8f601b114ec31116c8841ce7a887ca9e4b80966d935f7; fixture fixtures/authored/claims/LD01-SL-C36--v1.0.

Builder decisions (not Drive data)

VERSION = v1.0 — basis: Claim version taken from the repository-authored claim fixture version (SocioLens claim — LD01-SL-C36 v1.0); the first version of a new Claim of the LD-01 debate
CURRENT_POINTER = true — basis: repository-authored claim "SocioLens claim — LD01-SL-C36 v1.0" (Project Lead (Claude, AI), 2026-10-16); basis: AGENTS.md "Authority" (the Project Lead decides research content within the research-integrity rules) and the Owner's choice in the SocioLens project chat on 16 October 2026 to build the LD-01 debate; a new Claim, first version, written from the project's LD-01 source notes, checked against full texts, official web pages or official abstracts
FIELD_6_SOURCE_REFERENCE = SRC-SL-EC-GPAI-GUIDELINES-C-2025-7719--v1.0 — basis: field 6 of ENTRY 36 — LD01-SL-C36 cites "European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025"; the only field-6 segment of this ClaimVersion's repository-authored ledger block.
SOURCE_PROVENANCE_PIN = SRC-SL-EC-GPAI-GUIDELINES-C-2025-7719--v1.0 — basis: explicit version-pinned public provenance of this ClaimVersion (Amendment v1.2 §6): the pinned field-6 Source record "European Commission, “Guidelines on the scope of the obligations for providers of general-purpose AI models established by Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 (AI Act),” C(2025) 7719 final, 19 November 2025".